Travis County Jurors to Receive $27,000 After Live PD Evidence Tampering Case Dismissal
Travis County jurors will receive $27,000 in combined pay after the short-lived tampering trial against Robert Chody and Jason Nassour ended in dismissal.
Editorial disclaimer: Opinions and analysis on Keep TX Red are editorial content — not statements of fact. See our editorial standards.
The high-profile legal proceedings involving former Williamson County Sheriff Robert Chody and his legal advisor Jason Nassour reached an abrupt conclusion this week, leaving the empaneled jury with a combined payout of $27,000. For years, the case regarding the alleged destruction of 'Live PD' footage following the death of Javier Ambler loomed over the Austin area, creating a significant burden for the citizens summoned to resolve it. Despite the multi-year lead-up, the trial lasted only three days before it was dismissed, prompting a discussion regarding the costs of protracted litigation in Central Texas. Historically, Texas courts have struggled with the balance between speedy trials and the logistical hurdles of high-stakes political cases, and this instance serves as a stark reminder of how much public resource is expended before a single witness even finishes their testimony. The jurors, who had been on standby and subject to various scheduling shifts for an extended period, were ultimately compensated only for the time actually spent in the courtroom. This decision by the Travis County District Attorney’s office has sparked debate regarding whether the compensation appropriately reflects the years of disruption these citizens faced. The case itself centered on allegations that Chody and Nassour directed the destruction of video evidence that captured the pursuit and eventual death of Ambler in 2019, but the sudden dismissal means the merits of those claims will not be decided by this specific panel.
Texas relevance
This case is central to Texas law enforcement standards and the oversight of elected officials in the Austin-Round Rock metropolitan area. The legal battle highlights the friction between the Travis County District Attorney’s office and law enforcement agencies in neighboring Williamson County. It also underscores the financial and civic impact on Texas residents who are called for jury duty in cases that span multiple years due to administrative delays and legal maneuvering. The outcome affects how future tampering cases involving media entities like 'Live PD' are handled within the Texas judicial framework.
The Origin of the Tampering Allegations
The legal saga began in 2019 following a high-speed chase that crossed county lines. Javier Ambler, a father of two, died in custody after being repeatedly tasered by Williamson County deputies. The entire incident was filmed by a crew from the reality television show 'Live PD,' which at the time had a contract with the Williamson County Sheriff’s Office under Robert Chody's leadership.
Prosecutors alleged that Chody and Jason Nassour, the county’s legal counsel at the time, acted to ensure the raw footage of the incident was destroyed. The state argued this was a deliberate attempt to suppress evidence that could be used in a criminal investigation. The defense, however, consistently maintained that the footage was destroyed according to standard contractual agreements with the production company and that no criminal intent was present. This dispute sat in the Texas court system for years, navigating various pre-trial motions and delays.
The Jury Compensation Controversy
Jury service is often described as the backbone of the American justice system, but in Travis County, the experience for those assigned to the Chody case was one of prolonged uncertainty. The total payout of $27,000 represents the daily stipends for the group over the three days the trial was active. However, critics point out that these individuals had their lives disrupted for years while the case was repeatedly delayed and rescheduled.
In many Texas counties, the daily pay for jurors is relatively low, intended to cover basic expenses rather than replace lost wages. When a case stretches over several years of pre-trial preparation, jurors may face professional and personal strain even before they are officially seated. The fact that the DA’s office is strictly adhering to the three-day trial window for compensation highlights a potential flaw in how the system treats the time and commitment of Texas citizens.
The financial cost of $27,000 is only a small fraction of the total taxpayer money spent on this prosecution. Between investigative hours, expert witness fees, and the salaries of the prosecutors and court staff, the true cost to Travis County residents likely runs into the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, over the last half-decade.
Impact of the Sudden Dismissal
The dismissal of charges mid-trial is a rare and dramatic turn of events in Texas criminal law. It typically suggests that the prosecution recognized a fatal flaw in their evidence or that a judge ruled key portions of the state's case inadmissible. For the residents of Travis and Williamson counties, the lack of a definitive verdict leaves a cloud of uncertainty over the events of 2019.
Robert Chody, who lost his re-election bid in 2020 while under indictment, has long claimed that the charges were politically motivated. With the dismissal, he and Nassour exit the courtroom without a criminal conviction, though the political and social repercussions of the case continue to resonate. The dismissal also prevents the public from seeing the full extent of the evidence the DA claimed to possess, leading to further skepticism regarding the handling of the file.
The Role of Media in Texas Law Enforcement
This case brought national attention to the practice of 'ride-along' reality shows and their influence on police behavior. Texas legislators took note of the controversy, eventually passing 'Javier Ambler’s Law,' which prohibits law enforcement agencies in the state from entering into contracts with reality television shows. This legislative action was a direct response to the concerns that the presence of cameras might encourage deputies to take unnecessary risks or prioritize entertainment over safety.
The dismissal of the tampering charges does not undo the legislative changes, but it does complicate the narrative surrounding the 'Live PD' era in Williamson County. While the law now prevents such partnerships, the inability to secure a conviction for the alleged destruction of footage suggests that proving criminal intent in these complex contractual arrangements is a difficult hurdle for Texas prosecutors.
Future Implications for the Travis County DA
District Attorney Jose Garza has made the prosecution of police misconduct a cornerstone of his administration. However, this dismissal follows a pattern of high-profile cases that have struggled to reach a successful conclusion in court. The Chody case was seen as a flagship effort to hold high-ranking officials accountable, and its collapse may embolden critics who believe the office is overreaching for political purposes.
Moving forward, the DA’s office will likely face increased scrutiny over how it manages its trial calendar and how it communicates with victims' families and the public. As Austin continues to grapple with issues of public safety and police oversight, the fallout from this $27,000 jury payout and the resulting dismissal will serve as a point of contention in future election cycles.
Analysis
The dismissal of the Chody and Nassour case is a significant blow to District Attorney Jose Garza's office, which has prioritized high-profile prosecutions of law enforcement figures. By failing to secure a conviction—or even finish the trial—the DA faces criticism regarding the efficiency and preparedness of his staff. Paying out $27,000 to a jury that only heard three days of evidence after years of waiting is a visual representation of administrative waste. For Texas conservatives, this serves as another example of what many perceive as 'performative prosecution' in Austin, where the process itself becomes a form of punishment even if the legal grounds for a conviction are insufficient to survive a trial.
Source attribution
This story was reported using a public release from the r/austin. Keep TX Red rewrote the coverage independently and links to the official statement for verification.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why was the Chody case dismissed?
- The case was dismissed after three days of testimony when it became clear the prosecution could not meet the burden of proof required for the tampering charges. Specific legal hurdles regarding the intent behind the destruction of the 'Live PD' footage led to the sudden end of the trial.
- How is jury pay calculated in Travis County?
- Jurors are typically paid a daily stipend set by the county and state law for each day they are physically present in the courtroom. In this case, jurors were only compensated for the three days they heard evidence, despite being associated with the case for several years during the pre-trial phase.
- What was 'Javier Ambler’s Law'?
- It is a Texas state law passed in response to the death of Javier Ambler. It forbids Texas law enforcement agencies from partnering with reality television shows for filming during patrol or investigative duties, seeking to prevent 'entertainment-style' policing.
Official Sources
Take the next step
Browse the Newsroom →Read more about Keep Texas Red → Our full guide to what Keep Texas Red means and why Texans support it.
Get Texas updates delivered weekly.
Independent Texas reporting on politics, policy, and daily life. One email a week. Unsubscribe anytime.
Keep TX Red Newsroom
The Keep Texas Red Editorial Staff produces nonpartisan explainers, policy breakdowns, and educational resources to help Texans understand how their government works. All content is reviewed for accuracy and updated regularly.
About Keep TX Red →